Based on 6 responses
IANA stewardship should be neutral to any government.
It is all natural that all the functions of Domains and numbers should be under the multistakeholder hat.
stewardship of tha global DNS should be the responsibility of the multi stakeholder community
Yes, if both policy-making and IANA operation have enough accountability to the community and the community has enough power to redress the unfavorable activities of ICANN.
This is a multistakeholder environment, and will have the oversight built in to it.
ICANN should outsource the IANA operation so that there can be a choice of operators that can meet the SLA.
Yes, especially for the technical aspects of the IANA functions.
CC and g-Tlds should have more saying about oversight and control over IANA. But the decision should be clear multistakeholder - all have same saying.
- Presence of SLA's: - Mechanisms to redress
(This question can't be answerd by "Yes" or "No") To separate the framework of policy-making and that of operation.
better to have IANA operator as entity separate from ICANN
(This question can't be answerd by "Yes" or "No") Security and stability of the DNS and its operational arrangement are the most important regardless of where IANA function resides.
high logical importance
If IANA's budget is defined by the community, the result of the financial audit is the most important information for the community.
If the community choose to run IANA with another operator, the community have to suply funds to that operator.
Not sure, but it seems unneccesary to split up too much. And the two has been handled as one. Very hard to find funding for protocol?
(Cannot fully understand the question.)
There has to be clear roles if separeted.
There will be service agreement which specify the process for notifying the operator of additional TLDs and the cost thereof
there will be few. OK ICANN runs new gTLD process. Operator accepts only the results and not part of it
Anything that leads to a solution preserving stability, security,and resiliency and is simple.
I have no idea.
there is one: the simple one. limit the IANA operator functionality and selection to the technical community.